Research in turbulence seeks to achieve the primary objective of accurately representing forward and backward momentum and energy exchanges at all length and time scales. Although most of simulations can provide meaningful results in general applications, while not accurately representing small-scale exchanges, simulating complex flows found in multi-physics applications (combustion, particle-laden flow) require closure at the finest scales to accurately represent the process.
While scale-similarity methods "read" the flowfield at coarser scales to determine subgrid stresses at finer scales, they are severely restricted in representing the stress tensor in the number of degrees of freedom. Autonomic closure frees up the limit placed on the number of degrees of freedom by first building a representation that consider every possible term, followed by selecting the dominant terms that contribute to the stress tensor at a given point in space and time. The selection process is primarily driven by optimization methods, some of which find applications in general machine learning algorithms. The result is determining the most accurate representation that accounts for non-linear, non-local, and non-equilibrium effects in a turbulent flowfield.
The image shown above compares predicted stress tensor fields with autonomic closure (right) with the true DNS stress fields (left). The pdfs below (panel a, b) compare statistics between true DNS stress and production fields with the one determined by autonomic closure, while metrics M1, M2 in panel (c) reveal that errors between the two fields diminish as they are measured from finer scales to coarser scales for homogeneous isotropic turbulence and homogenous shear turbulence.